Measuring Acuity and Pediatric Critical Care Nursing Workload by Using ICU CAMEO III.

BACKGROUND: The Intensive Care Unit Complexity Assessment and Monitoring to Ensure Optimal Outcomes (ICU CAMEO III) acuity tool measures patient acuity in terms of the complexity of nursing cognitive workload. OBJECTIVE: To validate the ICU CAMEO III acuity tool in US children's hospitals. METHODS: Using a convenience sample, 9 sites enrolled children admitted to pediatric intensive care units (ICUs). Descriptive statistics were used to summarize patient, nursing, and unit characteristics. Concurrent validity was evaluated by correlating the ICU CAMEO III with the Therapeutic Intervention Scoring System-Children (TISS-C) and the Pediatric Risk of Mortality III (PRISM III). RESULTS: Patients (N = 840) were enrolled from 15 units (7 cardiac and 8 mixed pediatric ICUs). The mean number of ICU beds was 23 (range, 12-34). Among the patients, 512 (61%) were diagnosed with cardiac and 328 (39%) with noncardiac conditions; 463 patients (55.1%) were admitted for medical reasons, and 377 patients (44.9%) were surgical. The ICU CAMEO III median score was 99 (range, 59-163). The ICU CAMEO complexity classification was determined for all 840 patients: 60 (7.1%) with level I complexity; 183 (21.8%) with level II; 201 (23.9%), level III; 267 (31.8%), level IV; and 129 (15.4%), level V. Strong correlation was found between ICU CAMEO III and both TISS-C (ρ = .822, P < .001) and PRISM III (ρ = .607, P < .001) scores, and between the CAMEO complexity classifications and the PRISM III categories (ρ = .575, P = .001). CONCLUSION: The ICU CAMEO III acuity tool and CAMEO complexity classifications are valid measures of patient acuity and nursing cognitive workload compared with PRISM III and TISS-C in academic children's hospitals.

Primary prevention recommendations to reduce the risk of cognitive decline.

INTRODUCTION: Few resources address steps clinicians can take to help patients reduce their risk of dementia, despite growing recognition that brain health can be optimized and that risk reduction for cognitive decline can be accomplished by lifestyle modifications. METHODS: To address this gap, UsAgainstAlzheimer's convened a risk reduction workgroup (RRWG) to review existing evidence and develop recommendations for primary care clinicians discussing cognitive decline and risk reduction with their patients.  RESULTS: The RRWG produced 11 consensus-based recommendations and implementation strategies across six topics: neurovascular risk management, physical activity, sleep, nutrition, social isolation, and cognitive stimulation.  DISCUSSION: These recommendations are a first step for clinicians to address brain health with patients and potentially help them prevent cognitive decline. To ensure there is routine care for brain health, proper incentives and policies must be instituted and more education for consumers should be provided.

Effectiveness of the Malnutrition Quality Improvement Initiative on Practitioner Malnutrition Knowledge and Screening, Diagnosis, and Timeliness of Malnutrition-Related Care Provided to Older Adults Admitted to a Tertiary Care Facility: A Pilot Study.

BACKGROUND: Malnutrition is present in 30% to 50% of hospitalized patients aged 60 years or older. As few as 3.2% of patients identified as high risk have a malnutrition diagnosis documented by medical providers. The Malnutrition Quality Improvement Initiative (MQii) aims to reduce the burden of hospital malnutrition by improving the process and delivery of care. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate implementing the MQii toolkit of best practice resources for screening, diagnosis, documentation, and timeliness of malnutrition care. DESIGN: This 6-month prospective pilot included a 3-month intervention with training and education modules tailored to type of practitioner and integrated into existing teaching and clinical workflow. PARTICIPANTS/SETTING: Forty-five health care professionals from geriatric, general medicine, and general surgery units at Vanderbilt University Hospital during January to June 2016. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Malnutrition knowledge by 30-item questionnaire; electronic medical record (EMR) documentation; and timeliness of malnutrition screening, diagnosis, intervention, and discharge planning. STATISTICAL ANALYSES: Analysis of variance was used to test change over time. RESULTS: Malnutrition knowledge score increased 14%, from 39% to 53% (P=0.009). All patients whose nutrition screen indicated they were malnourished/high risk had registered dietitian nutritionist diagnosis of malnutrition documented in the EMR. The proportion who had medical provider (physician, nurse practitioner, or physician assistant) malnutrition diagnosis documented in the EMR increased 11.6%, from 26.7% to 38.3% (P=0.08). About 95% of malnourished/high risk patients had a documented intervention addressing malnutrition. Inclusion of malnutrition care in the discharge plan increased 4.8%, from 70.0% to 74.8% (P=0.13). CONCLUSIONS: This pilot study demonstrated feasibility of implementing the MQii resources to improve malnutrition knowledge and professionals' skills relevant to screening, diagnosis, intervention, and timeliness of malnutrition care. By optimizing the process and delivery of malnutrition care, it is expected that the quality of clinical care provided to older adults with malnutrition or at high malnutrition risk will improve.

Appropriate Use Criteria for Hyaluronic Acid in the Treatment of Knee Osteoarthritis in the United States.

OBJECTIVE: A workgroup of clinical experts has developed an Appropriate Use Criteria (AUC) for the use of hyaluronic acid (HA) in the treatment of osteoarthritis (OA) of the knee. The increasingly broad and varied use of HA injections, lack of published clinical guidance, and limited coverage for their use has created the imperative to establish appropriateness criteria. METHODS: The experts of this workgroup represent rheumatology, orthopedic surgery, physiatry, sports medicine, and nursing clinicians with substantive knowledge of intra-articular HA therapy. This workgroup utilized the results of a systematic review of evidence, expert clinical opinion, and current evidence-based clinical practice guidelines to develop appropriateness criteria for the use of intra-articular HA for knee OA in 17 real-world clinical scenarios. RESULTS: The workgroup scored the appropriateness of treatment of each patient scenario using a 9-point scale to designate a treatment as appropriate (7-9), uncertain (4-6), or inappropriate (1-3). Six scenarios were scored as appropriate, 10 scenarios were scored as uncertain, and 1 scenario was scored as inappropriate. CONCLUSION: This article can assist clinicians in shared decision-making by providing best practices in considering HA injections for knee OA treatment. Moreover, this AUC article can aid payers and policy makers in determining reimbursement and preauthorization policies and more appropriately managing health care resources. It is clear that further research is still necessary-particularly in patient populations differentiated by OA severity-that may benefit the greatest from the use of HA injections for the treatment of knee OA.

Effectiveness of two Arthritis Foundation programs: Walk With Ease, and YOU Can Break the Pain Cycle.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effectiveness of two Arthritis Foundation programs: Walk With Ease (WWE) and YOU Can Break The Pain Cycle (PC). DESIGN: Quasi-experimental, repeated measures design. Retested at six weeks and four months. SETTING: Community based intervention. PARTICIPANTS: Volunteer sample of 163 adults with arthritis recruited through mailings, newspapers, and flyers. INTERVENTIONS: Subjects participated in a 90 minute seminar (PC, Group A), a six-week walking program (WWE, Group B), or both programs (Group C). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Survey assessment of arthritis knowledge, general health, self-management activities, confidence, physical abilities, depression, health distress, and how arthritis affects their life. A Squat Test, a Six Minute Walk test, and a Timed Functional Walk Test were also administered. RESULTS: Subjects in Group B were more confident, less depressed, had less health distress, and less pain than subjects in Group A. Scores of Group C were between Group A and B scores. Differences in groups over time indicated that the WWE resulted in increased confidence, physical abilities, time spent in self-management activities and decreased pain and fatigue. All groups increased in walking endurance at six weeks, and increased in health distress at four months. CONCLUSION: Subjects in different programs differed on impact of arthritis. These programs provide effective arthritis management opportunities.